<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 69 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145211</link>
    <description>Where a statute confers discretion to stay tax payment and entertain an appeal despite non-payment, that discretion must be exercised judicially on the grounds and surrounding circumstances placed before the appellate authority. A bare demand notice or summary rejection, without a speaking order showing consideration of the request for stay, amounts to non-exercise of the statutory power. The availability of an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction where the complaint is a jurisdictional failure in the exercise of discretion. In such circumstances, the impugned rejection cannot stand and the appeals must be reconsidered from the stage of the payment notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:00:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 69 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145211</link>
      <description>Where a statute confers discretion to stay tax payment and entertain an appeal despite non-payment, that discretion must be exercised judicially on the grounds and surrounding circumstances placed before the appellate authority. A bare demand notice or summary rejection, without a speaking order showing consideration of the request for stay, amounts to non-exercise of the statutory power. The availability of an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction where the complaint is a jurisdictional failure in the exercise of discretion. In such circumstances, the impugned rejection cannot stand and the appeals must be reconsidered from the stage of the payment notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>