https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145206 The judgment confirmed the confiscation of non-Basmati Rice mis-declared as Indian Basmati Rice, upheld penalties on the exporter for lack of due diligence, and reduced fines and penalties imposed. The penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) was set aside due to lack of evidence linking them to the misdeclaration. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing responsibility and awareness in export transactions. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145206 The judgment confirmed the confiscation of non-Basmati Rice mis-declared as Indian Basmati Rice, upheld penalties on the exporter for lack of due diligence, and reduced fines and penalties imposed. The penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) was set aside due to lack of evidence linking them to the misdeclaration. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing responsibility and awareness in export transactions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145206