<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (8) TMI 53 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145201</link>
    <description>The right of appeal accrued when assessment proceedings were initiated, and that right was governed by the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, under which appeals could be entertained without prior payment of tax. A later provision in Section 21(6) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, requiring proof of tax and penalty payment before entertainment of an appeal, could not be applied retrospectively to curtail that accrued substantive right unless clear legislative intent existed. The Tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to insist on payment as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeals, and the later statutory requirement was inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (8) TMI 53 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145201</link>
      <description>The right of appeal accrued when assessment proceedings were initiated, and that right was governed by the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, under which appeals could be entertained without prior payment of tax. A later provision in Section 21(6) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, requiring proof of tax and penalty payment before entertainment of an appeal, could not be applied retrospectively to curtail that accrued substantive right unless clear legislative intent existed. The Tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to insist on payment as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeals, and the later statutory requirement was inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>