<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (10) TMI 141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145193</link>
    <description>Section 71 authorisation in the prescribed form for attendance before sales tax authorities need not contain every contractual term of engagement; it covers the right to appear and plead, while authority to act remains separate and depends on express agreement. For advocates, the statutory right to practise includes appearance and pleading when authorised. The article also states that such authorisations filed before executive taxing authorities are chargeable to court-fee under item 12 of Schedule II of the Bombay Court-fees Act, not to stamp duty under the Bombay Stamp Act, because the authorities are executive officers rather than courts. It notes that the impugned demands were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (10) TMI 141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145193</link>
      <description>Section 71 authorisation in the prescribed form for attendance before sales tax authorities need not contain every contractual term of engagement; it covers the right to appear and plead, while authority to act remains separate and depends on express agreement. For advocates, the statutory right to practise includes appearance and pleading when authorised. The article also states that such authorisations filed before executive taxing authorities are chargeable to court-fee under item 12 of Schedule II of the Bombay Court-fees Act, not to stamp duty under the Bombay Stamp Act, because the authorities are executive officers rather than courts. It notes that the impugned demands were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>