<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 86 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144204</link>
    <description>Composition of offences under the Mysore Sales Tax Act was treated as available even where a dealer wholly failed to issue bills or cash memoranda, because the omission itself constituted a contravention and the penal mechanism could still be worked out by reference to the amount that should have been entered. The article also notes that the turnover-based distinction in section 27, applying a higher billing obligation to dealers exceeding Rs. 20,000 turnover, was regarded as a permissible legislative classification with a rational link to assessment and tax computation, and therefore not violative of Article 14. The governing principle stated is purposive construction of taxing provisions and rational classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 86 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144204</link>
      <description>Composition of offences under the Mysore Sales Tax Act was treated as available even where a dealer wholly failed to issue bills or cash memoranda, because the omission itself constituted a contravention and the penal mechanism could still be worked out by reference to the amount that should have been entered. The article also notes that the turnover-based distinction in section 27, applying a higher billing obligation to dealers exceeding Rs. 20,000 turnover, was regarded as a permissible legislative classification with a rational link to assessment and tax computation, and therefore not violative of Article 14. The governing principle stated is purposive construction of taxing provisions and rational classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>