<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 86 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144204</link>
    <description>Composition of offences under the Mysore Sales Tax Act remained available where a dealer wholly omitted to issue bills or cash memoranda. The omission itself constituted a contravention, and the penalty could be calculated by treating the bill amount as the amount that should have been recorded; the levy was therefore valid. The turnover-based requirement to issue bills did not violate Article 14 because dealers above and below the prescribed threshold formed a permissible classification rationally connected with assessment and tax computation. The challenge to the levy failed, and the writ petition was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 86 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144204</link>
      <description>Composition of offences under the Mysore Sales Tax Act remained available where a dealer wholly omitted to issue bills or cash memoranda. The omission itself constituted a contravention, and the penalty could be calculated by treating the bill amount as the amount that should have been recorded; the levy was therefore valid. The turnover-based requirement to issue bills did not violate Article 14 because dealers above and below the prescribed threshold formed a permissible classification rationally connected with assessment and tax computation. The challenge to the levy failed, and the writ petition was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>