<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (6) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144182</link>
    <description>A filing deadline in the Madras sales tax rules could not defeat the concessional rate under the Central Sales Tax Act where Form C declarations were furnished before assessment. The rule-making power permitted prescription of form and manner, but not a time bar overriding the statutory benefit, so declarations filed within a reasonable time remained effective. Where defects in Form C declarations were noticed only at the appellate stage, the appellate authority had to allow rectification, since an appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings and natural justice required an opportunity to cure defects. Rejection solely for belated filing of corrected particulars was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (6) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144182</link>
      <description>A filing deadline in the Madras sales tax rules could not defeat the concessional rate under the Central Sales Tax Act where Form C declarations were furnished before assessment. The rule-making power permitted prescription of form and manner, but not a time bar overriding the statutory benefit, so declarations filed within a reasonable time remained effective. Where defects in Form C declarations were noticed only at the appellate stage, the appellate authority had to allow rectification, since an appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings and natural justice required an opportunity to cure defects. Rejection solely for belated filing of corrected particulars was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>