<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 65 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144159</link>
    <description>A distinct partnership firm could not be treated as liable for another firm&#039;s sales tax arrears merely because one partner was common to both, so recovery from the second firm&#039;s assets was impermissible. The text also states that specific partnership property cannot be attached as if it were the exclusive share of a defaulting partner, because partners are jointly interested in the whole of the partnership assets and no partner owns any identified asset separately. Accordingly, a creditor of an individual partner must proceed against the assessee firm&#039;s property or the partner&#039;s separate property, not against specific partnership assets of another firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:25:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 65 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144159</link>
      <description>A distinct partnership firm could not be treated as liable for another firm&#039;s sales tax arrears merely because one partner was common to both, so recovery from the second firm&#039;s assets was impermissible. The text also states that specific partnership property cannot be attached as if it were the exclusive share of a defaulting partner, because partners are jointly interested in the whole of the partnership assets and no partner owns any identified asset separately. Accordingly, a creditor of an individual partner must proceed against the assessee firm&#039;s property or the partner&#039;s separate property, not against specific partnership assets of another firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>