<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (10) TMI 62 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144158</link>
    <description>Arrest and imprisonment under the revenue recovery law are treated as an alternative recovery mode, so prior actual sale of the defaulter&#039;s property is not a condition precedent where the Collector can rationally conclude that sale would not substantially satisfy the arrears. The Collector&#039;s belief that payment was being wilfully withheld or fraudulently evaded was supported by concealment of accounts, alienation of property, discontinuance of business, and similar conduct. A joint-family defence also failed where the petitioner was the registered dealer and, in any event, the business discontinuance attracted joint and several liability. Execution of the arrest warrant by a police officer was held lawful in the absence of a statutory restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:19:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (10) TMI 62 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144158</link>
      <description>Arrest and imprisonment under the revenue recovery law are treated as an alternative recovery mode, so prior actual sale of the defaulter&#039;s property is not a condition precedent where the Collector can rationally conclude that sale would not substantially satisfy the arrears. The Collector&#039;s belief that payment was being wilfully withheld or fraudulently evaded was supported by concealment of accounts, alienation of property, discontinuance of business, and similar conduct. A joint-family defence also failed where the petitioner was the registered dealer and, in any event, the business discontinuance attracted joint and several liability. Execution of the arrest warrant by a police officer was held lawful in the absence of a statutory restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>