<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (10) TMI 61 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144153</link>
    <description>Where a taxing statute provides specific appellate and revisional remedies against an assessment, the validity of that assessment cannot be challenged collaterally in a recovery proceeding. The recovery court or Magistrate is confined to executing the demand and cannot go behind the assessment order or examine its legality. Section 32 barred questioning the assessment in such proceedings, and section 35 independently prevented any attempt to set aside or modify the assessment except through the Act&#039;s express remedies. The assessee&#039;s jurisdictional objection therefore failed, and the recovery action stood on the assessed demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (10) TMI 61 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144153</link>
      <description>Where a taxing statute provides specific appellate and revisional remedies against an assessment, the validity of that assessment cannot be challenged collaterally in a recovery proceeding. The recovery court or Magistrate is confined to executing the demand and cannot go behind the assessment order or examine its legality. Section 32 barred questioning the assessment in such proceedings, and section 35 independently prevented any attempt to set aside or modify the assessment except through the Act&#039;s express remedies. The assessee&#039;s jurisdictional objection therefore failed, and the recovery action stood on the assessed demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>