<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 92 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144137</link>
    <description>Exemption for potatoes did not extend to the gunny bags used as packing material, because exemption notifications are strictly construed and cover only the specified commodity. The court noted that the sale price was all-inclusive and included the value of the gunnies and packing charges, indicating an implied sale of the bags as a distinct commercial transaction. Statutory definitions of dealer, sale price and turnover supported taxation of the gunny bags, and the packing-charges deduction applied to labour and services, not the cost of packing material. The gunny bags were therefore separately taxable, and exemption could not be claimed for their value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:57:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 92 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144137</link>
      <description>Exemption for potatoes did not extend to the gunny bags used as packing material, because exemption notifications are strictly construed and cover only the specified commodity. The court noted that the sale price was all-inclusive and included the value of the gunnies and packing charges, indicating an implied sale of the bags as a distinct commercial transaction. Statutory definitions of dealer, sale price and turnover supported taxation of the gunny bags, and the packing-charges deduction applied to labour and services, not the cost of packing material. The gunny bags were therefore separately taxable, and exemption could not be claimed for their value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>