<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (8) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144121</link>
    <description>Section 16 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 empowers assessment of escaped turnover after notice and enquiry, but it does not expressly authorise assessment by best judgment. The court held that such a power cannot be implied in a taxing statute, especially where the Act uses express language elsewhere when best judgment assessment is intended. Legislative history and the statutory scheme supported the view that the omission was deliberate. The escaped-turnover assessments based on assumed best-judgment power were quashed, though the assessing authority remained free to proceed afresh under section 16 in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (8) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144121</link>
      <description>Section 16 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 empowers assessment of escaped turnover after notice and enquiry, but it does not expressly authorise assessment by best judgment. The court held that such a power cannot be implied in a taxing statute, especially where the Act uses express language elsewhere when best judgment assessment is intended. Legislative history and the statutory scheme supported the view that the omission was deliberate. The escaped-turnover assessments based on assumed best-judgment power were quashed, though the assessing authority remained free to proceed afresh under section 16 in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>