<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 131 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144120</link>
    <description>A dissolved partnership firm could not be assessed to sales tax for a pre-dissolution period once it had ceased to exist as an assessable entity, unless the statute expressly authorised post-dissolution assessment. The Court applied the unamended law, holding that the later amendment was not retrospective, and followed the principle that there is no material distinction between assessment proceedings begun before dissolution and those begun after dissolution if the assessment order is made only after the firm has ceased to exist. The impugned notices and assessment orders were quashed because no subsisting assessment order had been made before dissolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 131 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144120</link>
      <description>A dissolved partnership firm could not be assessed to sales tax for a pre-dissolution period once it had ceased to exist as an assessable entity, unless the statute expressly authorised post-dissolution assessment. The Court applied the unamended law, holding that the later amendment was not retrospective, and followed the principle that there is no material distinction between assessment proceedings begun before dissolution and those begun after dissolution if the assessment order is made only after the firm has ceased to exist. The impugned notices and assessment orders were quashed because no subsisting assessment order had been made before dissolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>