<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 67 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144079</link>
    <description>A nil assessment order may still be appealable if the assessee is prejudicially affected, because the appellate provision is not limited to assessments creating tax liability. Revisional power cannot be validly exercised against an assessment order that has not been communicated to the assessee, since communication is necessary for the appeal period and the revision period to run. The text states that the statute must be read consistently with fair play and natural justice, and that the department cannot rely on its own failure to communicate the order to extend limitation or defeat statutory protection. On that basis, the revision was set aside and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:47:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 67 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144079</link>
      <description>A nil assessment order may still be appealable if the assessee is prejudicially affected, because the appellate provision is not limited to assessments creating tax liability. Revisional power cannot be validly exercised against an assessment order that has not been communicated to the assessee, since communication is necessary for the appeal period and the revision period to run. The text states that the statute must be read consistently with fair play and natural justice, and that the department cannot rely on its own failure to communicate the order to extend limitation or defeat statutory protection. On that basis, the revision was set aside and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>