<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 60 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144066</link>
    <description>Charcoal was treated as falling within the commercial and popular meaning of &quot;coal&quot; for fiscal classification under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Because tax entries are construed in the sense in which goods are understood in trade, and charcoal was not separately named in the Schedule, it was placed in the specific entry for coal rather than the residuary entry. The result was tax at 2 per cent under Part III of Schedule II instead of the higher residuary rate. The governing principle is that commercial understanding prevails in construing fiscal entries, and a commodity within that understanding is not relegated to a residuary category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 60 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144066</link>
      <description>Charcoal was treated as falling within the commercial and popular meaning of &quot;coal&quot; for fiscal classification under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Because tax entries are construed in the sense in which goods are understood in trade, and charcoal was not separately named in the Schedule, it was placed in the specific entry for coal rather than the residuary entry. The result was tax at 2 per cent under Part III of Schedule II instead of the higher residuary rate. The governing principle is that commercial understanding prevails in construing fiscal entries, and a commodity within that understanding is not relegated to a residuary category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=144066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>