<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 35 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=142064</link>
    <description>The court quashed the assessment order in part, directing the respondent to re-compute the turnover and tax after excluding the disputed amount. The writ application was allowed, with costs awarded to the petitioner. The court highlighted that arbitrary assessments infringe on the right to conduct business and violate constitutional provisions on tax collection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 35 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=142064</link>
      <description>The court quashed the assessment order in part, directing the respondent to re-compute the turnover and tax after excluding the disputed amount. The writ application was allowed, with costs awarded to the petitioner. The court highlighted that arbitrary assessments infringe on the right to conduct business and violate constitutional provisions on tax collection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=142064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>