https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141067 A constitutional challenge to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Second Amendment) Act, 1955 was rejected where the complaint was that the amended Bill lacked the Governor's recommendation required for a Money Bill or for the amendment procedure. The Court treated Article 255 as curing invalidity arising from absence of the required recommendation or previous sanction once assent to the Act had been given and published. It also accepted that constitutional protection against procedural irregularity barred the attack on these facts. The enactment therefore remained valid on the ground urged, and the assessment challenge failed. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:32:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141067 A constitutional challenge to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Second Amendment) Act, 1955 was rejected where the complaint was that the amended Bill lacked the Governor's recommendation required for a Money Bill or for the amendment procedure. The Court treated Article 255 as curing invalidity arising from absence of the required recommendation or previous sanction once assent to the Act had been given and published. It also accepted that constitutional protection against procedural irregularity barred the attack on these facts. The enactment therefore remained valid on the ground urged, and the assessment challenge failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 05 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141067