<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 833 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141061</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted against a penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 in a service tax matter involving renting of immovable property. The assessee had paid the tax and interest before the show-cause notice and relied on a bona fide belief, absence of intent to evade, and the availability of relief from penal liability under Section 80. Those circumstances supported interim protection from recovery of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 833 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141061</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted against a penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 in a service tax matter involving renting of immovable property. The assessee had paid the tax and interest before the show-cause notice and relied on a bona fide belief, absence of intent to evade, and the availability of relief from penal liability under Section 80. Those circumstances supported interim protection from recovery of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>