<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 41 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141050</link>
    <description>Purchases made merely to fulfil antecedent export contracts are treated as preparatory steps and do not themselves occasion export, so they are not protected as transactions in the course of export under Article 286(1)(b). Iron and manganese ore purchases falling within Schedule III of the Mysore Sales Tax Act were therefore taxable under the single-point levy in section 5(3)(b). The Commissioner&#039;s suo motu revisional power under section 21(2)(i) was held to operate independently of pending appeals, as the statutory restriction in clause (ii) applied only to applications and did not curtail that revisional jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 41 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141050</link>
      <description>Purchases made merely to fulfil antecedent export contracts are treated as preparatory steps and do not themselves occasion export, so they are not protected as transactions in the course of export under Article 286(1)(b). Iron and manganese ore purchases falling within Schedule III of the Mysore Sales Tax Act were therefore taxable under the single-point levy in section 5(3)(b). The Commissioner&#039;s suo motu revisional power under section 21(2)(i) was held to operate independently of pending appeals, as the statutory restriction in clause (ii) applied only to applications and did not curtail that revisional jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>