<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (10) TMI 50 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141049</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;stainless steel articles&quot; in entry 20 of Schedule E to the Bombay Sales Tax Act was construed in its ordinary and comprehensive sense, and that meaning was held to include stainless steel utensils. The entry did not expressly exclude utensils; the only express exclusion concerned articles used as parts of industrial machinery or plant. The later amendment substituting the words &quot;steel articles including utensils&quot; was treated as clarificatory and not as creating a new taxable category. On that construction, stainless steel utensils fell within entry 20 and not the residuary entry 22, so the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (10) TMI 50 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141049</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;stainless steel articles&quot; in entry 20 of Schedule E to the Bombay Sales Tax Act was construed in its ordinary and comprehensive sense, and that meaning was held to include stainless steel utensils. The entry did not expressly exclude utensils; the only express exclusion concerned articles used as parts of industrial machinery or plant. The later amendment substituting the words &quot;steel articles including utensils&quot; was treated as clarificatory and not as creating a new taxable category. On that construction, stainless steel utensils fell within entry 20 and not the residuary entry 22, so the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>