<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 798 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141043</link>
    <description>The appellant, registered under &quot;Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Service,&quot; established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty penalty as denial of credit for input services used in maintenance and operation was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal allowed both stay applications, acknowledging the tax payments made on the entire contractual amount covering maintenance and operation services, leading to the waiver of the duty penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 798 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141043</link>
      <description>The appellant, registered under &quot;Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Service,&quot; established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty penalty as denial of credit for input services used in maintenance and operation was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal allowed both stay applications, acknowledging the tax payments made on the entire contractual amount covering maintenance and operation services, leading to the waiver of the duty penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=141043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>