<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 89 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140078</link>
    <description>Snuff was treated as included within &quot;tobacco&quot; because the Bengal Sales Tax Rules incorporated the statutory meaning from the Additional Duties of Excise Act and the Central Excises and Salt Act, whose definition of tobacco, read with the manufacture provision, covered snuff; the deduction under rule 3(28)(a) therefore applied. The State&#039;s 5% sales tax on snuff was also inconsistent for the relevant period, because tobacco was a declared good and the levy exceeded the 2% ceiling under section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act. The challenged assessment and demand notices were consequently unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 89 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140078</link>
      <description>Snuff was treated as included within &quot;tobacco&quot; because the Bengal Sales Tax Rules incorporated the statutory meaning from the Additional Duties of Excise Act and the Central Excises and Salt Act, whose definition of tobacco, read with the manufacture provision, covered snuff; the deduction under rule 3(28)(a) therefore applied. The State&#039;s 5% sales tax on snuff was also inconsistent for the relevant period, because tobacco was a declared good and the levy exceeded the 2% ceiling under section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act. The challenged assessment and demand notices were consequently unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>