<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 32 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140066</link>
    <description>Recovery as arrears of land revenue under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was confined to unpaid tax, penalty or forfeiture within section 38(5), and did not extend to a separate contractual liability of a surety under a surety bond. The amount claimed from the surety did not become tax or penalty merely because it secured another person&#039;s sales tax dues. Section 187 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 also did not help the State, because the bond contained no express stipulation that the surety&#039;s liability was recoverable as arrears of land revenue. The writ relief was therefore granted against such recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:46:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 32 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140066</link>
      <description>Recovery as arrears of land revenue under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was confined to unpaid tax, penalty or forfeiture within section 38(5), and did not extend to a separate contractual liability of a surety under a surety bond. The amount claimed from the surety did not become tax or penalty merely because it secured another person&#039;s sales tax dues. Section 187 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 also did not help the State, because the bond contained no express stipulation that the surety&#039;s liability was recoverable as arrears of land revenue. The writ relief was therefore granted against such recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>