<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 65 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140052</link>
    <description>Surplus materials left after construction, including cement bags, casurina poles and iron scrap, were taxable because their regular sale had a direct and reasonable connection with the contractor&#039;s construction business. The broad definitions of &quot;sale&quot; and &quot;dealer&quot; covered transactions that formed a subsidiary business linked to the main commercial activity and undertaken with a profit motive. The sales were treated as more than a mere realisation of capital assets, so they were includible in taxable turnover and liable to assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s exclusion of those sales was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 65 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140052</link>
      <description>Surplus materials left after construction, including cement bags, casurina poles and iron scrap, were taxable because their regular sale had a direct and reasonable connection with the contractor&#039;s construction business. The broad definitions of &quot;sale&quot; and &quot;dealer&quot; covered transactions that formed a subsidiary business linked to the main commercial activity and undertaken with a profit motive. The sales were treated as more than a mere realisation of capital assets, so they were includible in taxable turnover and liable to assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s exclusion of those sales was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=140052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>