<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 793 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=136047</link>
    <description>The judgment directed the appellant to reapply for a stay hearing before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) based on the cited decisions, emphasizing the need for a fresh hearing considering all legal points and applicable laws. The dismissal of the stay application and the appeal highlighted the procedural complexities involved in appeal processes and the significance of legal arguments in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 793 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=136047</link>
      <description>The judgment directed the appellant to reapply for a stay hearing before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) based on the cited decisions, emphasizing the need for a fresh hearing considering all legal points and applicable laws. The dismissal of the stay application and the appeal highlighted the procedural complexities involved in appeal processes and the significance of legal arguments in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=136047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>