<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 31 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=133044</link>
    <description>The court quashed the respondent&#039;s order and allowed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner lacked the requisite mens rea for the offense under Section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The penalty imposed under Section 10A was deemed invalid due to the absence of evidence showing that the representations were made falsely. The petition was granted with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 31 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=133044</link>
      <description>The court quashed the respondent&#039;s order and allowed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner lacked the requisite mens rea for the offense under Section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The penalty imposed under Section 10A was deemed invalid due to the absence of evidence showing that the representations were made falsely. The petition was granted with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=133044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>