<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 73 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=133043</link>
    <description>Section 26(3) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 deemed allotment of a dissolved firm&#039;s goods to partners as a sale, but the Gujarat HC noted that Entry 54 in List II extends only to taxation of real sales or purchases of goods. Because a sale requires transfer of property for money consideration, distribution of assets in specie on dissolution, even with adjustment of partners&#039; rights, is not a sale. The court further held that a statutory fiction cannot be expanded beyond the Legislature&#039;s competence to tax a non-sale transaction. The provision was therefore ultra vires to that extent, and sales tax could not be fastened on the dissolved firm&#039;s distribution of assets as a deemed sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 73 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=133043</link>
      <description>Section 26(3) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 deemed allotment of a dissolved firm&#039;s goods to partners as a sale, but the Gujarat HC noted that Entry 54 in List II extends only to taxation of real sales or purchases of goods. Because a sale requires transfer of property for money consideration, distribution of assets in specie on dissolution, even with adjustment of partners&#039; rights, is not a sale. The court further held that a statutory fiction cannot be expanded beyond the Legislature&#039;s competence to tax a non-sale transaction. The provision was therefore ultra vires to that extent, and sales tax could not be fastened on the dissolved firm&#039;s distribution of assets as a deemed sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=133043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>