<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 44 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129043</link>
    <description>Where a dealer claims that turnover is exempt from single-point tax as second sales, the burden lies on the dealer to prove the facts within special knowledge, consistently with section 10 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and section 106 of the Evidence Act. On the facts, the assessee proved second sales only for part of the radio turnover, so the balance remained taxable. Receipts from a commercial photo studio were treated as sales of goods because the transaction involved production and supply of finished photographs, not a mere contract for work and labour. The assessment was therefore sustained for both turnovers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:22:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 44 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129043</link>
      <description>Where a dealer claims that turnover is exempt from single-point tax as second sales, the burden lies on the dealer to prove the facts within special knowledge, consistently with section 10 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and section 106 of the Evidence Act. On the facts, the assessee proved second sales only for part of the radio turnover, so the balance remained taxable. Receipts from a commercial photo studio were treated as sales of goods because the transaction involved production and supply of finished photographs, not a mere contract for work and labour. The assessment was therefore sustained for both turnovers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>