<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 728 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal did not grant a total waiver of pre-deposit in the case. An interim measure was imposed, requiring the Appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within a specified timeline to safeguard the Revenue&#039;s interest. Compliance with this directive would stay the realization of the remaining demand. The Tribunal justified this decision by referring to a precedent set by the Apex Court in a relevant case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 728 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal did not grant a total waiver of pre-deposit in the case. An interim measure was imposed, requiring the Appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within a specified timeline to safeguard the Revenue&#039;s interest. Compliance with this directive would stay the realization of the remaining demand. The Tribunal justified this decision by referring to a precedent set by the Apex Court in a relevant case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>