<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 812 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129037</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal despite a 70-day delay, as there was no mala fide intent. The delay was condoned in the interest of justice, following the precedent set by the Apex Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:57:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 812 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129037</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal despite a 70-day delay, as there was no mala fide intent. The delay was condoned in the interest of justice, following the precedent set by the Apex Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>