<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 891 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129034</link>
    <description>For interim relief, the Tribunal considered whether a lease-equipment arrangement with instalments collected as lease rentals could prima facie fall within &quot;banking and other financial services&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant invoked ejusdem generis to argue that &quot;any other body corporate&quot; covers only entities engaged in financial activities akin to a financial institution, while the Revenue relied on the agreement&#039;s recitals and option-to-purchase clause to characterise the transaction as a financial service. Relying on earlier stay orders taking a similar prima facie view, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the service tax and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 891 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129034</link>
      <description>For interim relief, the Tribunal considered whether a lease-equipment arrangement with instalments collected as lease rentals could prima facie fall within &quot;banking and other financial services&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant invoked ejusdem generis to argue that &quot;any other body corporate&quot; covers only entities engaged in financial activities akin to a financial institution, while the Revenue relied on the agreement&#039;s recitals and option-to-purchase clause to characterise the transaction as a financial service. Relying on earlier stay orders taking a similar prima facie view, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the service tax and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>