<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 56 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129017</link>
    <description>A nil assessment order under the Madras General Sales Tax Act acquires legal effect only when it is served in a prescribed statutory mode. Mere file notation that the order was &quot;despatched&quot; did not prove valid service under the rules, so the appeal period had not begun and the Deputy Commissioner could not validly exercise suo motu revisional power under section 32 while that limitation period remained open. The presumption of regularity could not cure the absence of proof of service. On that footing, the revisional authority lacked jurisdiction and the assessment on the disputed turnover was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 56 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129017</link>
      <description>A nil assessment order under the Madras General Sales Tax Act acquires legal effect only when it is served in a prescribed statutory mode. Mere file notation that the order was &quot;despatched&quot; did not prove valid service under the rules, so the appeal period had not begun and the Deputy Commissioner could not validly exercise suo motu revisional power under section 32 while that limitation period remained open. The presumption of regularity could not cure the absence of proof of service. On that footing, the revisional authority lacked jurisdiction and the assessment on the disputed turnover was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>