<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (4) TMI 104 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129001</link>
    <description>Administrative press notes did not constitute statutory exemption notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act where they merely reflected the prevailing legal position or administrative directions. Subsequent validating legislation restored taxability of the relevant sales, supporting assessments made after validation despite the earlier press note. Tax lawfully payable following validation could not be refunded merely because it had been deposited before assessment or because an earlier administrative arrangement existed. The assessment for the relevant quarter remained within the prescribed limitation period, and no factual basis established payment under threat or coercion to restrict liability to actual collections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:54:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (4) TMI 104 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129001</link>
      <description>Administrative press notes did not constitute statutory exemption notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act where they merely reflected the prevailing legal position or administrative directions. Subsequent validating legislation restored taxability of the relevant sales, supporting assessments made after validation despite the earlier press note. Tax lawfully payable following validation could not be refunded merely because it had been deposited before assessment or because an earlier administrative arrangement existed. The assessment for the relevant quarter remained within the prescribed limitation period, and no factual basis established payment under threat or coercion to restrict liability to actual collections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>