<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128982</link>
    <description>The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that &quot;art charges and translation charges&quot; should not be included in the taxable turnover assessment. The Tribunal found these charges to be separate from the sale of blocks and design services provided by the advertising firm. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128982</link>
      <description>The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that &quot;art charges and translation charges&quot; should not be included in the taxable turnover assessment. The Tribunal found these charges to be separate from the sale of blocks and design services provided by the advertising firm. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>