https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128971 An insurance claim filed more than three years after repudiation was held barred by limitation. The contractual stipulation in clause 6(ii) was also upheld because it did not merely curtail the time for bringing proceedings; it extinguished the right itself if the claim was not pursued within the stipulated period. On that reasoning, the clause was not hit by section 28 of the Contract Act, 1872, and the challenge to its validity failed. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128971 An insurance claim filed more than three years after repudiation was held barred by limitation. The contractual stipulation in clause 6(ii) was also upheld because it did not merely curtail the time for bringing proceedings; it extinguished the right itself if the claim was not pursued within the stipulated period. On that reasoning, the clause was not hit by section 28 of the Contract Act, 1872, and the challenge to its validity failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128971