<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (4) TMI 94 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128958</link>
    <description>Inter-State sales effected in Punjab and causing movement of goods to Jammu and Kashmir were taxable under the Central Sales Tax Act because liability attached to the sale from the State where the movement commenced, not to the destination State. The exclusion of Jammu and Kashmir from the Act&#039;s territorial extent did not take such transactions outside the charging provisions. Constitutional objections based on discrimination and export failed because Jammu and Kashmir remained part of India for constitutional purposes, no impermissible discrimination was shown, and the transactions were not sales in the course of export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (4) TMI 94 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128958</link>
      <description>Inter-State sales effected in Punjab and causing movement of goods to Jammu and Kashmir were taxable under the Central Sales Tax Act because liability attached to the sale from the State where the movement commenced, not to the destination State. The exclusion of Jammu and Kashmir from the Act&#039;s territorial extent did not take such transactions outside the charging provisions. Constitutional objections based on discrimination and export failed because Jammu and Kashmir remained part of India for constitutional purposes, no impermissible discrimination was shown, and the transactions were not sales in the course of export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>