<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 721 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128953</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the Appellant, directing the waiver of pre-deposit until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal found the denial of benefits unjustified as the annual certificate of GTA provided by the Appellant was acceptable, and the Authorities had not provided valid reasons for disallowing the claim based on consignment notes lacking appropriate certificates. Previous tribunal decisions supporting the assessee in similar situations were referenced, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 721 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128953</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the Appellant, directing the waiver of pre-deposit until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal found the denial of benefits unjustified as the annual certificate of GTA provided by the Appellant was acceptable, and the Authorities had not provided valid reasons for disallowing the claim based on consignment notes lacking appropriate certificates. Previous tribunal decisions supporting the assessee in similar situations were referenced, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>