<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (5) TMI 56 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128952</link>
    <description>An exemption notification is confined to the published statutory text, so an unpublished rider or administrative note cannot by itself extend the exemption. Applied to phosphor bronze ingots, the court treated lead and phosphorus as deliberate ingredients of a distinct alloy, not excusable impurities, and held that the alloy did not fall within an exemption limited to copper, tin, nickel and zinc and their alloys. The sale was therefore taxable and outside the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (5) TMI 56 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128952</link>
      <description>An exemption notification is confined to the published statutory text, so an unpublished rider or administrative note cannot by itself extend the exemption. Applied to phosphor bronze ingots, the court treated lead and phosphorus as deliberate ingredients of a distinct alloy, not excusable impurities, and held that the alloy did not fall within an exemption limited to copper, tin, nickel and zinc and their alloys. The sale was therefore taxable and outside the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>