<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (6) TMI 48 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128922</link>
    <description>Under the Central Sales Tax Act, the concessional rate depended on a sale to a registered dealer supported by Form C. The Court held that where goods were supplied under one purchase order, instalment delivery and payment through separate invoices did not by themselves create separate contracts or separate sales; the transaction had to be read as a whole. Since the contract did not provide for distinct instalment sales and the split was only for convenience, one Form C covering the purchase order was sufficient. The assessee remained entitled to the concessional rate, and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (6) TMI 48 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128922</link>
      <description>Under the Central Sales Tax Act, the concessional rate depended on a sale to a registered dealer supported by Form C. The Court held that where goods were supplied under one purchase order, instalment delivery and payment through separate invoices did not by themselves create separate contracts or separate sales; the transaction had to be read as a whole. Since the contract did not provide for distinct instalment sales and the split was only for convenience, one Form C covering the purchase order was sufficient. The assessee remained entitled to the concessional rate, and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>