<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128918</link>
    <description>An amended appeal provision under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed to remove the earlier requirement of pre-deposit of penalty before an appeal could be entertained. The court held that the deletion of words referring to payment of penalty had to be given full effect, because reading &quot;tax&quot; to include penalty would defeat the legislative purpose of easing hardship. The Tribunal&#039;s insistence on prior deposit was therefore treated as an to exercise jurisdiction vested in it, and the appellate orders refusing to hear the matter were quashed. The appeals were directed to be heard on merits without pre-deposit of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128918</link>
      <description>An amended appeal provision under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed to remove the earlier requirement of pre-deposit of penalty before an appeal could be entertained. The court held that the deletion of words referring to payment of penalty had to be given full effect, because reading &quot;tax&quot; to include penalty would defeat the legislative purpose of easing hardship. The Tribunal&#039;s insistence on prior deposit was therefore treated as an to exercise jurisdiction vested in it, and the appellate orders refusing to hear the matter were quashed. The appeals were directed to be heard on merits without pre-deposit of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>