<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (4) TMI 58 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128913</link>
    <description>Groundnut oil used in the manufacture of vanaspati or soap was treated as a &quot;component part&quot; for section 3(3) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because the statutory phrase was given its ordinary meaning: an article that contributes to the composition of the finished product. The test was not whether the ingredient retained a separate and visible identity after manufacture. As the oil went into the composition of vanaspati, it qualified for declaration forms and the concessional rate of tax for the relevant period before 10 January 1962; the later explanation inserted by Madras Act 44 of 1961 was not applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (4) TMI 58 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128913</link>
      <description>Groundnut oil used in the manufacture of vanaspati or soap was treated as a &quot;component part&quot; for section 3(3) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because the statutory phrase was given its ordinary meaning: an article that contributes to the composition of the finished product. The test was not whether the ingredient retained a separate and visible identity after manufacture. As the oil went into the composition of vanaspati, it qualified for declaration forms and the concessional rate of tax for the relevant period before 10 January 1962; the later explanation inserted by Madras Act 44 of 1961 was not applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>