https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128901 The statutory right to file a revision is not a fundamental right, and the Legislature may lawfully attach conditions to that remedy. Requiring deposit of the security demanded before a revision against an order for furnishing security can be maintained affects only the exercise of the revisional remedy, not the freedom to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). The condition is therefore not an unreasonable restriction on business activity, because the Legislature was not obliged to confer the revision remedy at all and could regulate it by appropriate terms. The second proviso to section 8-A(6) was upheld as valid. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:44:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128901 The statutory right to file a revision is not a fundamental right, and the Legislature may lawfully attach conditions to that remedy. Requiring deposit of the security demanded before a revision against an order for furnishing security can be maintained affects only the exercise of the revisional remedy, not the freedom to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). The condition is therefore not an unreasonable restriction on business activity, because the Legislature was not obliged to confer the revision remedy at all and could regulate it by appropriate terms. The second proviso to section 8-A(6) was upheld as valid. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 21 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128901