<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 882 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128890</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, granting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment clarified the distinction between penalties under different acts and emphasized the specific provisions of Section 76 in relation to delayed payment of service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:31:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 882 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128890</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, granting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment clarified the distinction between penalties under different acts and emphasized the specific provisions of Section 76 in relation to delayed payment of service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>