<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 719 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128889</link>
    <description>Section 117(1) of the Finance Act, 2000 was treated as inapplicable because the departmental action was taken before the President&#039;s assent to the amended provisions. On that factual basis, the earlier dismissal of the appeal was not shown to contain any error warranting review, so no ground for review was found. The recorded assent date was corrected to 12-5-2000. The review petition was dismissed, and the application for condonation of delay was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 719 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128889</link>
      <description>Section 117(1) of the Finance Act, 2000 was treated as inapplicable because the departmental action was taken before the President&#039;s assent to the amended provisions. On that factual basis, the earlier dismissal of the appeal was not shown to contain any error warranting review, so no ground for review was found. The recorded assent date was corrected to 12-5-2000. The review petition was dismissed, and the application for condonation of delay was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>