https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128867 Repeated public allegations imputing corruption to Judges and continued hostile publications were treated as serious contempt because they interfered with the administration of justice and undermined public confidence in the judicial process. The apology was rejected as insincere and merely a device to avoid punishment, since the contemner persisted in the offending conduct and defied the earlier undertaking to the Court. The governing principle stated is that an apology in contempt proceedings is acceptable only when it is sincere, bona fide, and shows real remorse; where that standard is not met, punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act may follow. en-us Thu, 05 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128867 Repeated public allegations imputing corruption to Judges and continued hostile publications were treated as serious contempt because they interfered with the administration of justice and undermined public confidence in the judicial process. The apology was rejected as insincere and merely a device to avoid punishment, since the contemner persisted in the offending conduct and defied the earlier undertaking to the Court. The governing principle stated is that an apology in contempt proceedings is acceptable only when it is sincere, bona fide, and shows real remorse; where that standard is not met, punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act may follow. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128867