<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (7) TMI 75 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128859</link>
    <description>Availability of an alternative appellate remedy does not bar a writ petition under Article 226 where a quasi-judicial order is passed in breach of natural justice without hearing the affected party. The High Court treated the writ as maintainable and rejected the preliminary objection. It further held that, for an application to set aside an ex parte assessment under section 30 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the requirement of depositing &quot;tax admitted to be due&quot; depends on an actual admission of liability; where no return was filed and liability was denied, the authority could not insist on deposit of assessed tax as admitted tax. The refusal to entertain the application was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (7) TMI 75 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128859</link>
      <description>Availability of an alternative appellate remedy does not bar a writ petition under Article 226 where a quasi-judicial order is passed in breach of natural justice without hearing the affected party. The High Court treated the writ as maintainable and rejected the preliminary objection. It further held that, for an application to set aside an ex parte assessment under section 30 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the requirement of depositing &quot;tax admitted to be due&quot; depends on an actual admission of liability; where no return was filed and liability was denied, the authority could not insist on deposit of assessed tax as admitted tax. The refusal to entertain the application was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>