<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 41 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128843</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court upheld the tax liability on the turnover of surplus materials sold by building contractors. The court determined that the contractors qualified as dealers under the Act, emphasizing the continuous business of buying and selling goods. It was clarified that the profit motive assessment applied to the overall business activity rather than individual transactions, rejecting the argument that specific sales without a profit motive were exempt from tax. The judgment confirmed the applicability of sales tax on surplus material sales and the dealer status of the contractors, maintaining the tax liability based on the overarching profit motive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:06:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 41 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128843</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court upheld the tax liability on the turnover of surplus materials sold by building contractors. The court determined that the contractors qualified as dealers under the Act, emphasizing the continuous business of buying and selling goods. It was clarified that the profit motive assessment applied to the overall business activity rather than individual transactions, rejecting the argument that specific sales without a profit motive were exempt from tax. The judgment confirmed the applicability of sales tax on surplus material sales and the dealer status of the contractors, maintaining the tax liability based on the overarching profit motive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>