<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (12) TMI 17 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128820</link>
    <description>Hire-purchase documents may be treated as a real sale followed by a hiring back where, read as a whole, they show an actual transfer of title to the finance company and a later resale to the customers. A credit motive does not prevent that characterisation if the sale letter, bill, receipt and hire-purchase agreement are consistent with genuine transfer of property and no connected document displaces that effect. A registration form describing the customers as owners was explained by the statutory definition of owner for hire-purchase vehicles. On that analysis, the resale was liable to sales tax and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:51:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (12) TMI 17 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128820</link>
      <description>Hire-purchase documents may be treated as a real sale followed by a hiring back where, read as a whole, they show an actual transfer of title to the finance company and a later resale to the customers. A credit motive does not prevent that characterisation if the sale letter, bill, receipt and hire-purchase agreement are consistent with genuine transfer of property and no connected document displaces that effect. A registration form describing the customers as owners was explained by the statutory definition of owner for hire-purchase vehicles. On that analysis, the resale was liable to sales tax and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>