<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 40 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128819</link>
    <description>The revisional power under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was confined to matters properly within the revisional field and did not extend to reopening an assessment on the footing that turnover had escaped assessment. That function belonged to the assessing authority under the separate reopening provision dealing with escaped turnover or under-assessment. Revision and reassessment were treated as distinct and mutually exclusive powers, so a revisional authority could not re-estimate turnover on the basis of escaped turnover. The enhancement made in revision was therefore invalid, and the assessee&#039;s assessment as restored by the appellate tribunal remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 40 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128819</link>
      <description>The revisional power under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was confined to matters properly within the revisional field and did not extend to reopening an assessment on the footing that turnover had escaped assessment. That function belonged to the assessing authority under the separate reopening provision dealing with escaped turnover or under-assessment. Revision and reassessment were treated as distinct and mutually exclusive powers, so a revisional authority could not re-estimate turnover on the basis of escaped turnover. The enhancement made in revision was therefore invalid, and the assessee&#039;s assessment as restored by the appellate tribunal remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>