https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128797 The Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to prove that the completion and finishing activities in their interior decoration services did not involve materials, impacting their tax liability. As a result, the Tribunal directed the Appellant to make an interim deposit of Rs. 2 crores to safeguard the Revenue's interests due to the suppression of facts and pending tax liabilities. The Tribunal granted a conditional right to appeal, stipulating compliance within a specified timeframe to suspend the realization of the remaining demand during the appeal process. en-us Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:27:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128797 The Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to prove that the completion and finishing activities in their interior decoration services did not involve materials, impacting their tax liability. As a result, the Tribunal directed the Appellant to make an interim deposit of Rs. 2 crores to safeguard the Revenue's interests due to the suppression of facts and pending tax liabilities. The Tribunal granted a conditional right to appeal, stipulating compliance within a specified timeframe to suspend the realization of the remaining demand during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128797