<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128790</link>
    <description>Conversion of standing timber into firewood was treated as manufacture because the process created a commercially distinct, marketable article in the course of business. On that basis, the firewood was liable to sales tax as the manufactured product. The objection that taxing timber first and firewood later amounted to double taxation was rejected, because the assessment attached to the transformed commodity rather than to the raw material itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:00:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128790</link>
      <description>Conversion of standing timber into firewood was treated as manufacture because the process created a commercially distinct, marketable article in the course of business. On that basis, the firewood was liable to sales tax as the manufactured product. The objection that taxing timber first and firewood later amounted to double taxation was rejected, because the assessment attached to the transformed commodity rather than to the raw material itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>